Latest Publications

Free Webinar on Differences Between Education, Lobbying & Adovacy

Education, Advocacy & Lobbying – Oh My!: What’s Allowed (and What’s Not) When Reaching out to Elected Officials
Date: Tuesday, December 6th, 2011
Time: 4pm-5pm EST

Webinar Overview:

Politicians, lobbyists and advocates alike use the terms “education,” “advocacy” and “lobbying” interchangeably.   But what do they all mean?  When associated with a government agency or a non-profit it can be very confusing to know what’s allowed – and what will land you in hot water.  In this session we’ll look at both the letter and the spirit of the law when it comes to lobbying and advocacy, as well as specific criteria you can use to assess your own situation.  Since local library supporters, whether staff, friends, trustee or board members, have the most influence in the legislative process, it’s important to know just how far you can go in connecting them with policymakers.  Believe it or not, you have more latitude than you think.  And, of course, as a private citizen no one can curtail your right to speak up and make a difference.

Register NOW!

Respectfully Reposted: ALA District Dispatch

 

 

 

 

 

 

Urgent: Contact your U.S. Senators – ask them to sign on to library funding letter!

Senators Jack Reed and Olympia Snowe are leading an effort to increase support for FY2012 federal funding for the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) and Improving Literacy Through School Libraries. Call your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121 and ask them to sign onto this letter by Wednesday, June 8th! Tell your senators’ staffers to contact Elyse Wasch in Reed’s office or Matthew Hussey in Snowe’s office. We need the support of other senators to sign this Reed-Snowe letter ASAP. What does this mean? We need you to call IMMEDIATELY.

While you are on the phone, think about describing at least ONE valuable and important service that your library provides to the community or even a success story about a patron.

(reposted – ALA Washington Newsletter)

Library Copyright Alliance Statement on Copyright Reform

The LCA (Library Copyright Alliance) released a statement yesterday describing the key features copyright reform proposals should include in order to improve the current law for libraries and their users.  The LCA’s statement describes the status quo for libraries as well as the procedures that would constitute significant legislative improvement to existing copyright law.Check out the full post here!

Reposted

Let Your State Officials Know How Important Libraries Are to You!

Did you know?

April 10–16 is “National Library Week” and this year’s theme is “Create your own story @ your library.” Why is this important? Well, it’s a perfect opportunity for you to let your legislators know how important libraries are to you, so tell your story. Libraries need your voice!

Take a moment to send an e-mail to your governor and your representatives today, and pass this message on to your friends and colleagues.

Be an advocate for you library!

Reposted: Michael Dowling at ALA Office

Support PATRIOT Act Reform!

ALA District Dispatch is encouraging you to contact your representative and Senators as Congress will be acting soon to renew the USA PATRIOT Act. There are three provision of the USA PATRIOT Act, including Section 215, the ‘library’ provision that expire on May 27, 2011.

Call your Representatives and urge them to support reforms as a condition of renewal.

Read the full blog post from District Dispatch here.

Governor Chafee’s (RI) Proposed State Aid to Libraries

Governor Chafee’s 2012 Proposed Budget includes level funding of state aid to libraries. You can view the budget here.

NEW! Clickable Maps

New clickable maps available that link to either legislative pages or Capwiz sites:

At the I Love Libraries site: http://www.ilovelibraries.org/takeaction/findyourstate.cfm

Another at the Chapter Relations site: http://www.ala.org/ala/aboutala/offices/cro/legislationandadvocacy/takeactionlibraries.cfm

Action Alert

Taken from: ALA Website

CALL TO ACTION: Ask your Senator to demonstrate his/her support for S. 1373, the “Federal Research Public Access Act of 2009,” by supporting and co-sponsoring the bill.

We are asking all supporters of public access in select states-including librarians, library patrons, faculty, students, researchers, research institutions, consumers, patients, and the public-to please contact their Senators.
Please ask your Senator to support and co-sponsor S. 1373, the “Federal Research Public Access Act of 2009″(FRPAA), which was introduced on June 25, 2009.
If your senator is:
Daniel Akaka (D-HI)
Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Bob Bennett (R-UT)
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Sherrod Brown (D-OH)
Roland Burris (D-IL)
Thomas R. Carper (D-DE)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Susan M. Collins (R-ME)
Richard J. Durbin (D-IL)
John Ensign (R-NV)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
John McCain (R-AZ)
Claire McCaskill (D-MO)
Mark Pryor (D-AR)
Jon Tester, (D-MT)
George V. Voinovich (R-OH)
This much anticipated bill (previously introduced in 2006) would ensure free, timely, online access to the published results of research funded by 11 U.S. federal agencies. S. 1373 was introduced on June 25, 2009, by Senators Lieberman (I-CT) and Cornyn (R-TX) and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. According to the bill, its purpose is, “to provide for Federal agencies to develop public access policies relating to research conducted by employees of that agency or from funds administered by that agency.” The text of the bill is available online via THOMAS.
What does this mean for libraries and the public?
S. 1373 requires Federal agencies and departments with annual extramural research budgets of over $100 million to make available via the Internet the final articles resulting from research funded by U.S. taxpayers (the public) no later than six months after publication in peer-reviewed journal.  The manuscripts would be maintained and preserved in a digital archive, ensuring the research is available to the public.
Essentially, the bill would advance and expand the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy, which requires public access to taxpayer-funded research, to an additional 11 agencies. The ability to search and access the archive of non-classified research of these agencies and departments-from the Department of Agriculture and the Department of Commerce to the Environmental Protection Agency and the National Science Foundation-would provide open online access to research. Undoubtedly, such an archive would allow librarians the ability to better assist library patrons with their information and research needs as well as allow the direct access by the public.
Without the passage of bill S. 1373, taxpayer-funded research will continue to be inaccessible (without a fee) to those already funding it-the public. Additional information about bill S. 1373 (FRPAA) is available on the ALA Web site.

Why are we asking you to contact key members of Congress now?

The ALA strongly supports S. 1373, and this summer the ALA Council adopted a resolution in support of it (reaffirming its support from 2006). The resolution has been faxed to the Senators listed above. Your messages will reinforce this support.
Additionally, scholars and faculty who write these articles, together with higher education administrators, supported the bill in 2006. They are continuing to support the reintroduced S. 1373, as demonstrated in this open letter from 57 presidents of liberal arts colleges.
Librarians can explain, from a different viewpoint, how this bill will improve the lives of members of our communities by extensively increasing access to information.

Know Your Stimulus!

Check out ALA’s Know your Stimulus Page!   kys POD.2 copy

ACRL Joins Amicus Brief

The American Library Association (ALA), the Association of Research
Libraries (ARL), the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), the Organization for Transformative Works and the Right to Write Fund have filed an amicus curiae brief asking the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit to reverse the Federal District Court judge’s ruling in Salinger v. Colting.

In July, the District Court ruled in favor of author J.D. Salinger, who
claimed that Fredrik Colting, the author of “60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye,” infringed his copyright on “Catcher in the Rye.” The District Court’s preliminary injunction prohibits the publication and distribution of the book, which the groups believe implicates free speech rights of authors, publishers and the public protected by the First Amendment.

In their “friend of the court” filing, the groups also assert that the judge
applied too narrow an interpretation of the “fair use” doctrine, which permits new, transformative works into the marketplace.

A copy of the amicus brief can be found online at

http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/system/files/Salinger%20Amicus%20Brief%20%28filed%29.pdf