|
In this Issue |
ACRL New England
Chapter News Online Virtual, Digital, and Funded:
Transforming Library Collections and
Access On an unseasonably warm and sunny November 19, 1999, Bernard Margolis, President of the Boston Public Library, greeted more than 250 librarians at the Library's Rabb Auditorium for a day long program about digital library collections and access. The conference was co-sponsored by ACRL New England and the Boston Library Consortium. The keynote speaker, Library Journals insightful Roy Tennant, manager of UC/Berkeley's Digital Library SunSITE, began his remarks by debunking several pervasive digital myths--for instance, assertions that soon everything will be digital (which confronts the reality of hybrid libraries as sources for both digital and traditional media); that digital formats are qualitatively better than print; that digital formats will replace print; that digital resources are cheaper than print resources; that digital resources are equally available for all disciplines; or that all digital library projects are equally worthy, by definition, of support. Noting key issues and trends, Tennant suggested that
libraries could expect "more of the same" AND more of what
digital technology could offer. He predicted that the term
"library" may one day refer to a digital library, but the
trend toward hybrid libraries (containing both digital and
traditional media) is already becoming reality, and this
hybrid will increasingly offer services and resources to
users, regardless of time or place, and meet the expanding
demand for personalized academic support. The staff of the
emerging hybrid libraries will need new technology
competencies to fulfill new roles. David Remsen, Bioinformatics Manager at the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole, followed the keynote speaker with a highly visual and lively presentation representing his work with digitized images. Remsen, linking the practice of marine biology to an understanding of literature in the field, commented on disturbing issues of preservation and permanence in the digital age. He demonstrated the added value created in digitizing rare and inaccessible collections. Like Tennant, Remsen saw libraries developing and managing hybrid mechanisms for storage, access, and use of resources in the future. Three librarians followed the conference luncheon with useful strategies for fund-raising. Cathy Norton, director of the Marine Biological Laboratory and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute Library, stressed the value of long-range planning and incremental steps for projects, as part of developing successful fund-raising proposals. She noted the current appeal, and corresponding fundability, of projects aimed at assessing technology's impact on teaching and learning. Elaine Martin, library director at UMASS Medical Center, offered detailed advice on proposals for digital library projects. She cited several sources for information about federal grants to libraries and specific government grants for preservation and access (http://library.umassmed.edu/grantfunding.html#Federal). Brown University's Special Collections head librarian, Rosemary Cullen, discussed project development and provided a demonstration of images from Browns Ameritech-funded African American Sheet Music Digitizing Project (http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/award97/rpbhtml/aasmhome.html). She also talked generally about the appeal of special collections for fund-raising projects. Arnold Hirshon, NELINET Executive Director and the concluding speaker, reminded everyone that access to information involves the collaboration of many libraries. Rather than anticipate state-by-state projects, Hirshon advocated the regional opportunities for library collaboration. He spoke from his experience in Ohio and Pennsylvania about the access advantages of single and multiplatform bibliographic systems as they contribute to virtual union catalogs (VUCs). Some advantages of a single platform VUC include a high degree of data integrity, the seamless transfer of search terms, fully merged search results, and fully interactive circulation data. But single platform systems are expensive to create and
operate, requiring replacement of all local systems at same
time and the synchronization of local and central system
data. Agreements to form multiplatform VUCs are easier to
achieve since they do not require unanimous consent from all
member libraries, and they can be very cost effective (using
existing Z39.50 compliant local catalog systems). But Z39.50
variances can contribute to more complicated searching for
users, and their quality depends on adherence to standards
by local participants.
|